Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:21:29 -0500
Message-Id: <200301021821.h02ILT622037@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200301021809.h02I9mG22840@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
	(ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se)
Subject: Re: stubify
References:  <200301021809 DOT h02I9mG22840 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Does it matter what the option is named? I was thinking of "-s".

gcc already has a "-s" option.  You should use something that begins
with "-m" like "-mstack=" to be consistent with other options.

The stubify option can be pretty much anything as far as gcc is
concerned.

> Note the option in the help text is "-g" and the option we test for is
> "-v".

-g means something different to stubify.