From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200212310103.gBV13jt27469@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: stubify
To: DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:03:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I think this patch:
Index: djgpp/src/stub/stubify.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/stub/stubify.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -p -u -r1.4 stubify.c
--- djgpp/src/stub/stubify.c    14 Dec 1999 12:01:36 -0000      1.4
+++ djgpp/src/stub/stubify.c    31 Dec 2002 00:57:28 -0000
@@ -103,7 +107,7 @@ void coff2exe(char *fname)
     }
     else
     {
-      fprintf(stderr, "Warning: input file is not COFF or stubbed COFF\n");
+      fprintf(stderr, "Warning: input file is not COFF nor stubbed COFF\n");
       break;
     }
   }

improves the error message. What do you natives of English say?


Remember I talked about a stack size option to stubify? I've added
code to get an environment variable's value to choose the stack
size. This way those that do want a big stack size can set it and it
won't affect us that doesn't want it, except when we run programs
somebody else built. (Or possibly the other way round.)


Right,

						MartinS