Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:54:03 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2950-Fri20Dec2002205403+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <10212200432.AA05792@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: More size considerations
References:  <10212200432 DOT AA05792 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:32:38 -0600 (CST)
> 
> I've found that dpmiexcp.c uses both write() and _write().  We really only
> need _write_int in all of these cases...  but for now I'll at least 
> fix the writes to _writes.

Right.  The use of `write' is an omission, I'm sure.