Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:35:47 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2110-Tue17Dec2002223547+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3DFE4B7F.1F46D3BD@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:54:07 +0000)
Subject: Re: proposed putpath.c patch
References: <10212152352 DOT AA21607 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3DFE4B7F DOT 1F46D3BD AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:54:07 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Shouldn't it be @file{x:} rather than @var{x:}? x: isn't a variable for the
> function.

No, x: stands for some specific drive letter (which isn't known to the
author of the text).  So it's a meta-syntactic variable, and thus
needs a @var.

> I don't think you need @file{@var{x:}<whatever>}. I think
> @file{x:<whatever>} will do.

Actually, it should be @file{@var{x}:}, since the colon is not part of
the drive name.