Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3DFB815F.5212018C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:07:11 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1]
References: <3DF7C2BD DOT 31601BA7 AT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021212075923 DOT 15584F-100000 AT is> <20021212135449 DOT GA4441 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3DF9D928 DOT E78ECF4D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <20021213135345 DOT GA19578 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3DFB4DD0 DOT 335457CC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200212141739 DOT gBEHdA501566 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

DJ Delorie wrote:
[snip]
> If the list gets too big, the sheer size will discourate people from
> reading it.  I'm trying to balance it so that it is most helpful to
> the most people.  Do you think autoconf and automake fall into this
> category?  I wouldn't think anyone who isn't developing software would
> need them, and since a majority of djgpp users only use the
> prepackaged software, I don't see it as a major issue.

autoconf and automake don't really fall into that category. I'll leave the
list as-is.

> On the other hand, I would really like simtel to have the latest
> rhide, and add rhide to the list.  That gets asked about a lot.

I agree that RHIDE belongs on that list. Given the number of FAQs about RHIDE
1.4.9, I wonder when 1.5.0 will be out.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]