Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:20:50 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <5137-Fri13Dec2002132050+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3DF9BCBF.8EFF6656@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:55:59 +0000)
Subject: Re: scanf buffer overflow; support 'hh' conversion specifier [PATCH]
References: <10212130137 DOT AA01762 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3DF9BCBF DOT 8EFF6656 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:55:59 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Is it OK to apply the patch for scanf to support 'hh', fix the buffer overflow
> and make X comply with C99? I think we've beaten this X thing to death now. ;)

Please don't forget to mention the change in what X does in wc204.txi
(apologies if you already did that in the patches you've posted
earlier).