From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200212112017.gBBKHaB15505@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
In-Reply-To: <10212111759.AA24198@clio.rice.edu> "from Charles Sandmann at Dec
 11, 2002 11:59:20 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:17:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Charles Sandmann:
> >     http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html
> 
> Thanks, looks good.  Under incompatibilities section, might mention
> new symlink format (V2.03 won't understand them).  But I still don't think
> this will be a big deal since nothing else outside the DJGPP toolchain
> will understand them either.

Ehum. Didn't we adopt the format from cygwin or something?


Right,

						MartinS