Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3DF76386.5CBCDF0A@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:10:46 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
[snip]
> CBFalconer wrote:
> [snip]
> > Is there any particular reason for not identifying the zip as
> > being revised, such as "fil41-4.zip"?  There is no clue to this in
> > the mini-faq postings.
> 
> We could include this information in the mini-FAQ, e.g.: "fileutils-4.1 rel.
> 4" or "fileutils-4.1r4", if "fileutils-4.1 release 4" takes up too much
> space.
> 
> I wonder what DJ thinks.
[snip]

Any objections if I update the mini-FAQ to have fileutils-4.1r4 in it?

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]