From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT softhome DOT net>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:26:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
Message-ID: <3DF712EB.20674.B6B0E@localhost>
In-reply-to: <10212111423.AA22481@clio.rice.edu>
References: <00ca01c2a0fd$a1d8b860$0100a8c0 AT p4> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Dec 11, 2002 09:10:41 PM
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Next question.  Why is the binutils changing the coff headers?  Maybe
> we should go back to an earlier binutils unless something in it is
> absolutely required.

And exactly what change in binutils troubles upx?

Mark