Message-ID: <3DF644DC.D953275C@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:47:41 -0500
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
References: <10212101635 DOT AA17564 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
... snip ...
> 
> > 4 Should we compress distributed binaries using UPX?
> 
> I'd like to know exactly what breaks this ... If it's some new
> binutils feature we can live without ...

Why bother?  The end user can do it.  pakke might be organized to
do it on the fly (if I ever get inspired to actually try pakke).

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!