Subject: Re: C++ and linker script issue
From: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <10212092156.AA24429@clio.rice.edu>
References: <10212092156 DOT AA24429 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1039508934.1453.2.camel@leeloo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 
Date: 10 Dec 2002 09:28:54 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 22:56, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> > Has anything happened with regard to the C++ and linker script issue. (See
> > Andris's message "Re: V2.04 work list (was... status page)" on Thu, 19 Sep
> > 2002 05:51:41 +0300.) What exactly goes in the .bss.<something> sections?
> 
> On a related note, the DXE linker script needs to be updated if we plan
> to support C++ modules (lots of new sections).

But supporting C++ fully would also require some very gcc-specific
changes to dxeload to support exceptions (I had working exception
support in a dlx-derivate for gcc 2.95.3, but gcc 3 broke that, and
I haven't spent much time trying to get it to work again).

-- 
Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>