From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10212041652.AA05798@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.04 readme update again [Was Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GCC-3.2.1]
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:52:52 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <009c01c29a9e$6431a2c0$0100a8c0@p4> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Dec 03, 2002 06:33:48 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > =====================================================================
> > NOTE: You need last update of djdev203.zip with timestamp of August 2002
> > or later.
> > =====================================================================
> 
> From this I think the 2.04 readme needs updating again to indicate people
> should use the djdev203.zip of August 2002 or later instead of December
> 2001.

This is only an issue for GCC 3.x - so when/if GCC is upgraded then 
djdev needs to be also.  Maybe that's what the readme should say.