Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3DEC8110.FF2D211B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:01:52 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: strtold is now a standard function (C99) [PATCH] References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Richard Dawe wrote: > > > BTW I'm not sure if this is repeatable, but recently I saw the following. > > I had a .c and .S file with the same stem. I changed the makefile to > > assemble .S file rather than compile a .c file, but it still compiled > > the .c file rather than the .S file. > > Something to do with built-in rules of GNU Make, I'd guess. Try to play > with .SUFFIXES or something. We currently have this in src/makefile.inc: .SUFFIXES: .o .i .c .cc .s My test situation was this: cd /path/to/djgpp/tree cd src mkdir foo cd foo touch foo.c foo.S ---Start src/foo/Makefile--- TOP=. #SRC += foo.c SRC += foo.S include $(TOP)/../makefile.inc ---End src/foo/Makefile--- I tried: shifting .s to the front; adding .S to the end; adding .S to the front. None of this made any difference: the .c file was always compiled and the .S file was always ignored, when I did "make clean && make all" in src/foo. So it looks like we can't have a .c and .S file with the same stem. This makes sense: where would the object file go? But it still troubles me that the makefile builds the .c in preference to the .S. BTW why isn't .S in .SUFFIXES? Thanks, bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]