From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200212021831.gB2IVZC17599@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: df FAT32 bug [Was: Re: old packages on simtel]
In-Reply-To: <3DEB8A57.8C60EE72@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
 Dec 2, 2002 04:29:11 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:31:35 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Richard Dawe:
> Martin Stromberg wrote:
> [snip]
> > What about making 4.1 work with CVS libc (df FAT32 bug)?
> 
> It does. You will need to apply the diff from here, otherwise 'rm' may
> segfault sometimes:
> 
> http://iolanthe/~rich/freeserve/richdawe/djgpp/fileutils/4.1/djgpp/

www.iolanthe.org you mean.

> Which bug are you talking about? Is it the one we were talking about in the
> thread containg this message?
> 
>     "Re: RESEND: Re: File UItils at Clio 2.04 Query"
>     Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:37:52 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> I think I have something hooking INT 0x21, which limits the reported sizes to
> < 2GB, as documented in the info docs. I will look at this problem - I just
> haven't got round to it yet.

Yes that's the one.


Right,

						MartinS