X-Sybari-Trust: 2f413f95 ca231590 b7e212f9 00000138
From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200212021143.MAA15665@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: old packages on simtel
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:43:50 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <3DEB4698.C5C52D8F@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Dec 02, 2002 11:40:08 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > No. Perhaps at least one of them must stay. I had problems with 4.1 (on
> > Win95, mkdir crashed in some script but I didn't have time to look for more
> > details), where both 4.0 and 3.16 worked Ok.
> [snip]
> 
> OK. I'd prefer 4.0 to be kept. It seems to have been just as reliable as 3.16.
> What do you think, Eli?
> 
> If you see it again, please let me know what you were doing. Then I can try to
> reproduce it.

What about making 4.1 work with CVS libc (df FAT32 bug)?


Right,

						MartinS