Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 07:51:33 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: old packages on simtel
In-Reply-To: <200211302129.gAULTCD04536@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021202074738.29205B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, DJ Delorie wrote:

> binutils: 2.11.2, 2.12.1, 2.13

I suggestt o keep 2.11.2 for now.

> bison: 1.28, 1.29, 1.30, 1.32, 1.33, 1.35

IIRC, there was some non-trivial changes between 1.28 and 1.3x.  If 
that's true, I think we want to keep 1.28 and the 2 latest ones.

> diff: 2.7.2, 2.8

I think, given the lack of complaints, 2.7.2 can be removed.

> emacs: 19.34, 20.5

We need both, since 19.34 is the last one without m17n support, and is 
much leaner.

> gcc: 2.95.2, 2.95.3, 3.0.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.2.1

I think we need to keep 2.95.3 and the two last 3.x versions.

> gdb: 4.18, 5.0, 5.1.1, 5.2.1

See my other message.

> gawk: 3.0.6, 3.1.1

As long as 3.1.x corrects more and more bugs, I think we should keep 
3.0.6.

> gzip: 1.2.4, 1.3

Keep both, they are small.

> ispell: 3.1.20, 3.2.06

I think we can remove the old Ispell by now.

> less: 358, 374

I'd keep both.

> texinfo: 4.0, 4.2

4.0 can be removed, I think.  Hopefully, someone will upload 4.3 shortly.