From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10211252112.AA17220@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.04 CVS Build plan
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:12:49 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <200211251531.gAPFVFl31301@envy.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Nov 25, 2002 10:31:15 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > I have not looked at the GLIBC licenses in much detail, so I do not
> > know if porting code from GLIBC to the DJGPP LIBC will cause any
> > problems.
> 
> Nope, can't use glibc sources.  Sorry.

How about if we put them in libglibc.a (a new library), make sure 
people recognize linking to it has different license terms (not 
automatically linked), but it would provide c99 support?

Just an idea, but a big build change...