Message-ID: <000d01c2946c$73885ad0$0100a8c0@p4>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <200211250814 DOT JAA08806 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Subject: Re: 2.04 CVS Build plan
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:21:12 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

...SNIP..
> > The other thing I didn't mention above is C99 compliance.  It will be a
> > real shame if we release in 2003 and don't support C99.  Would someone
> > *PLEASE* look at what's needed to get there and create a worklist?
>
> Well isn't that a lot of functions that still needs to be written? And
> no coders?
I have not looked at the GLIBC licenses in much detail, so I do not know if
porting code from GLIBC to the DJGPP LIBC will cause any problems.

The Linux GLIBC code has the C99 functions and they are easy to port then
does anyone know of any problems with this? It may speed up getting more C99
functions in the DJGPP LIBC.