Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:08:31 -0500
From: 2boxers <2boxers AT comcast DOT net>
Subject: Re: djcrx203.zip refresh (June 2002)
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <005d01c28a5d$5d4aa5c0$021ca8c0@helm>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <10211120238 DOT AA21596 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
 <002501c28a10$b1612a00$021ca8c0 AT helm> <200211121028 DOT 20817 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > The patch.lib located in ~/cross... what is it for?  I realize it
modifies
> > the linker script, but when applied, it causes the libstdc++ build to
fail
> > and the compilers not to work.  Maybe this question seems foolish, but
why
> > is this patch in this package?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Any answers to this one? anybody?
In what circumstance is it necessary to apply patch.lib?


> 6) Have existing directory /usr/gcc-lib/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp/3.2 when
running
> make (unless You're builing GCC with root permissions)

Should this say?
Have existing directory /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp/3.2 when running
make (unless You're builing GCC with root permissions)

> 7) There may be need to rename C++ header directory after that, but I
don't
> remeber exactly as I haven't tested it yet.

Just curious, why do the shell scripts change so many names in libstdc++?

> Hopefull I have'n forgot something significant. I would be nice if
somebody
> would go through this and update docs in djcrx. I don't have plans to do
it
> myself in near future.

I will be glad to help with any documentation.  There is just the small
matter of getting all this to work first ;)

>
> Andris
>

Andris,
 Thank you.
Charles Wilkins