Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:52:31 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <9003-Mon04Nov2002215230+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <Pine.A41.4.05.10211041726220.24300-100000@ieva06> (message from
	Andris Pavenis on Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:30:59 +0200 (WET))
Subject: Re: LIBC 2.04 new function atoll() implementation
References:  <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10211041726220 DOT 24300-100000 AT ieva06>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:30:59 +0200 (WET)
> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> 
> Somebody may want to have member of some structure 
> or class with this name. I once run into trouble as had a member function
> named printf in class which does similar thing as printf does, but
> send output somewhere else related to that class.

You shouldn't be doing this: the standard says that the names of all
the standard functions are reserved, so no other identifier can use
them.