Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:00:13 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se
Subject: Re: LIBC 2.04 new function atoll() implementation
In-Reply-To: <006501c282ce$9efa41b0$0100a8c0@p4>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021103075939.22669B@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

> > Yes. atoll() is there in C99 and the prototype is
> > long long int atoll(const char *nptr);
> 
> I read the other message and now get the 'int' lines.
> 
> The plot thickens as strtoll() returns a 'long long' and not a 'long long
> int'....

"long long" and "long long int" are the same thing.  So there's no 
problem here.