Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:10:14 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: lauras AT softhome DOT net, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 building with 2.04 trouble on W2K (NTVDM crash)
In-Reply-To: <10210290040.AA19077@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021029080926.21619G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> > Maybe an obvious question but does 'put show_call_frame in your own
> > wrapper' imply that simply removing 'static' is not good enough?
> 
> You need to set the exception state structure; you may be able to do
> this with setjmp() - but I don't remember for sure.

There's an example of this in dpmiexcp.c, it does so for fake signals 
such as SIGABRT.