Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:09:06 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 building with 2.04 trouble on W2K (NTVDM crash)
In-Reply-To: <6338011457.20021028223842@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021029080740.21619F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> It runs as if getch() (or kbhit(), or scanf(), or system() ...) call
> was a no-op.

So that means the failure doesn't happen when you add the call to `getch'.

What if you replace getch() with a call to `sleep' that sleeps enough 
seconds to give you time to look around the directory where the program 
tries to create the response file?