From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10210210223.AA21360@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: CBFalconer's malloc
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:23:07 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <3DB32764.292952DC@yahoo.com> from "CBFalconer" at Oct 20, 2002 06:00:04 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I originally designed that to suppress the debuggery via the
> makefile with the make command line, which I suppose is
> incompatible with building the library.  Is there anything
> routinely defined when library building that would make compiling
> debug test versions easy?  

No.

> Maybe the solution is to use a make
> define to build the debug versions, rather than the inverse?

Default build should be without debug; create a define to build the
debug version (which would typically be done manually anyway).