From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10210172226.AA21624@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: CVS tag for 2.04 alpha 1?
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:26:47 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <3DAEFC7F.2F6D5A67@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Oct 17, 2002 07:07:59 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Should I apply a CVS tag for 2.04 alpha 1? I notice that releases have tags
> like v2.03. I suggest we use the tag v2.04a1.

I don't see a reason to save the tags for the alphas and betas, so I
wouldn't tag anything until right before 2.04 release.  Just more clutter.