From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <200210171423.QAA21208@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: stub.asm patch for 2.02 => 2.04 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:23:57 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: <200210171402.g9HE28m24644@envy.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Oct 17, 2002 10:02:08 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > IIRC, that version number is the version of the stub itself, not the > version of djgpp it shipped with. If the stub hasn't changed since > 2.02, don't change the version number. Well, then it's (or should be) 2.03 now, : CVS log for djgpp/src/stub/stub.asm Up to djgpp/src/stub/ Request diff between arbitrary revisions No default branch 1.4 Sat Jun 9 20:43:06 2001 UTC by ams CVS Tags: HEAD Diffs to 1.3 Don't use environment variables after PATH to look for CWSDPMI. 1.3 Mon Sep 7 18:54:26 1998 UTC by dj CVS Tags: v2_03, v2_02, v2_03_1 Diffs to 1.2 import djgpp 2.02 1.2 Sat Oct 5 18:49:52 1996 UTC by dj CVS Tags: v2_01 Diffs to 1.1 import djgpp 2.01 1.1 Sun Dec 24 0:19:44 1995 UTC by dj CVS Tags: v2_00 import djgpp 2.00 After this I've made some small space optimisations to it as well (and perhaps some other change that I can't remember now). Are we interested in shrinking the stub another byte or two? Right, MartinS