Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:32:21 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <51168290418.20021014163221@softhome.net>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: 2.03 vs 3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2002 14:30:52.0297 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C54C790:01C2738E]
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello,

I believe header fixes in 2.03 mk2 are not complete - if we
include GCC's <stdarg.h> and later on our <stdio.h>, we get
redefinition warnings. Ordinary users won't see this, because these
warnings are suppressed in system headers. However, if we try to build
2.03 libc, it strikes, because these headers are not treated like
system in this case. If we ever plan to make 2.03mk3 or something like
that, we should backport my patch
http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/12/02/08:56:40
It adjusts stdio.h et al not to redefine stuff again.

What do others think?

FYI, I'm slowly making my way to get 2.03 compile without warnings. I've backported
lots of IMO safe patches from 2.04.

Laurynas