Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3D921394.708AE7A6@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:50:44 +0100 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: We've fixed some bugs listed in the bug tracker References: <3D8F7B22 DOT 99C7CD9D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209232038 DOT g8NKcAu10960 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D8F8703 DOT 6738C4FB AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209232139 DOT g8NLdDL12010 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D90BDEC DOT 3759094F AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200209242214 DOT g8OMEcT01337 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. DJ Delorie wrote: > > > For the ones I closed yesterday: 000230 fixed in CVS; 000352 fixed > > in 2.03 (refresh++). Perhaps we need some more versions listed - > > 2.03 refresh 1 & 2.03 refresh 2? > > They'd need to be single words. "Back when" we used 1.11m3 for the > "third maintenance release" (i.e. bugfix). We used 'a' for alphas and > 'b' for betas. Given that, how about 2.03m1 and 2.03m2 for the two > refreshes? I was going to suggest 2.03r1 and 2.03r2 with 'r' for refresh, but then I realised 'r' could be taken to mean release. So, 2.03m sounds fine to me. Thanks, bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]