From: "Mark E." To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:31:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: working toward a realpath implementation Message-ID: <3D8C3C7F.16730.1730FC@localhost> In-reply-to: <4098-Sat21Sep2002115837+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <3D8B92AB DOT 7174 DOT 567AAC AT localhost> (snowball3 AT softhome DOT net) X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > easier? Enlarging the max size has a minor disadvantage: we don't > detect file names beyond 260 characters that Windows 9X filesystems > cannot handle. If your saying PATH_MAX is too large, then perhaps it should be made smaller?