From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.04 status page correction
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 06:00:39 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7
References: <10209161715 DOT AA20704 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <2110-Fri20Sep2002193303+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <001e01c26108$87534850$0100a8c0 AT p4>
In-Reply-To: <001e01c26108$87534850$0100a8c0@p4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200209210600.40160.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g8L5w1202877
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Saturday 21 September 2002 03:47, Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> > >     1) GDB & Bin utilities does not support i786 (by default you can't
>
> build
>
> > > on P4 PC, changes to build are very easy)
> >
> > This should already be fixed in the latest GDB snapshots, perhaps
> > even in the latest release GDB 5.2.1.  Please check.
>
> Has anyone done a port of GDB 5.2.1 yet, even a DJGPP beta version that I
> can download and test? I build on a P4 which in the configure stage is
> detected as a i786.

I have archives already for a month at:
	http://hal.astr.lu.lv/pub/djgpp/gdb/

I could also upload them to ftp.djgpp.com if Eld don't have time to prepare
his own packages and upload (he had such intention at least in August AFAIK)

There also seems to be DJGPP related problems with DWARF2 debugging info
and more recent CVS versions of DJGPP (at least some weeks ago), but I 
haven't looked into details, so I don't know whether upcoming 5.3 will build 
for DJGPP without changes

Andris