From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10209171957.AA14707@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.04 status page correction
To: pavenis AT latnet DOT lv (Andris Pavenis)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:57:40 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell),
   rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk (Richard Dawe)
In-Reply-To: <200209171938.41699.pavenis@latnet.lv> from "Andris Pavenis" at Sep 17, 2002 07:38:41 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > 6) Currently becuase of the rm.exe issue you can't reliably rebuild GCC
> > 3.2 on XP. It will build once and then the second time the exe's won't be
> > re-built from memory. I am assuming that once the rm.exe is fixed then GCC
> > 3.2  builds will work.
> 
> I'm using fileutils-4.0 to build GCC. I don't know though whether it will 
> work under WinXP

The fileutils 4.0 built with 2.03 refresh worked fine on XP last time
I checked.