From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>,
   "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>,
   "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.04 status page correction
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:38:41 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7
Cc: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <10209161715 DOT AA20704 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3D862656 DOT 54CED140 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <007401c25e2d$1789eed0$7397adcb AT p4>
In-Reply-To: <007401c25e2d$1789eed0$7397adcb@p4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200209171938.41699.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g8HJdNH09792
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tuesday 17 September 2002 12:31, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

>     6) Currently becuase of the rm.exe issue you can't reliably rebuild GCC
> 3.2 on XP. It will build once and then the second time the exe's won't be
> re-built from memory. I am assuming that once the rm.exe is fixed then GCC
> 3.2  builds will work.

I'm using fileutils-4.0 to build GCC. I don't know though whether it will work 
under WinXP

Andris