From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200209020625.IAA14634@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Two rm.exe issues on XP
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:25:18 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <10209020454.AA16618@clio.rice.edu> from "Charles Sandmann" at Sep 01, 2002 11:54:47 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I haven't been using filutils 4.1 on Win2K, so I don't know if I would
> see this - but it seems to indicate our inode algorithm for Win2K isn't
> reproducible.  Has the algorithm changed between V2.03 and CVS?

Yes. Because of FAT32 it's generating numbers > 2^28.


Right,

						MartinS