Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:18:25 +0300 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Andrew Cottrell <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
Cc: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Groff 1.16 & GCC 3.1 query
In-Reply-To: <002301c21f0a$e8f68800$0100a8c0@p4>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10206290816040.10950-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Andrew Cottrell wrote:

> Tim,
> 
> Thansk for this. I have hand modified the makfile produced to use gpp
> instead of gcc for C++ files and it now works.

I think that should work without manual modifications of Makefile if
some hint is given to configure. As far as I remember I saw something
similar with gcc-3.0.X and was able to workaround it with some hint for 
configure.

Andris

> Andrew
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
> Cc: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Groff 1.16 & GCC 3.1 query
> 
> 
> > On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 11:53, Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> > >
> > > gcc -g -O2  -o groff groff.o pipeline.o
> /dev/c/dj204/gnu/groff-1.16/src/libs/libgroff/libgroff.a  -lm
> > > groff.o: In function `possible_command::~possible_command
> [not-in-charge]()':
> > > groff.cc:424: undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)'
> >
> > groff is using gcc instead of gpp for linking it seems.
> > So the C++ libs are not being linked in, hence the errors.
> >