Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:42:53 +0100
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60h) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <41253079238.20020626164253@softhome.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Clio 2.04 packages
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020616082445.26367E-100000@is>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020616082445 DOT 26367E-100000 AT is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2002 14:43:55.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5AEE030:01C21D1F]
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


>> I'm not sure this is as much of a problem as is stated here.  Any symlinks
>> would be unusable by old images - but they would also be unusable by 
>> any non DJGPP toolchain program.  So, I don't believe this is that big
>> an issue

> I didn't say it was a big issue; note the ``subtly'' part.

> I just don't like subtle misfeatures.

In fact, when I was writing symlinks, I was expecting big objections
from Eli because of that - symlinks *will* create FAQs...

Laurynas