Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3D17724F.6983F319@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:26:07 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch for pow bugs
References: <E17J9QT-0000QQ-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	 <3D138D79 DOT E05E7DBA AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3D174E9C DOT A66BB4B7 AT cyberoptics DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eric Rudd wrote:
> 
> Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> > Eric [Rudd], did the patch your posted (which is incorporated into the one
> > I posted) pass any regression tests?
> 
> I ran the three relevant tests in djtst203: cephes, elefunt's tpower, and
> paranoia.  None of those test apps revealed any significant problems.  (Of
> course, they didn't find the subtle bug in the old libc pow(), either, but
> at least it gives us some confidence that no major new bugs have been
> introduced by the patch.)  I see no reason not to commit the patch.

Thanks. I've just committed the patch.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]