Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:48:34 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04
In-Reply-To: <10206162313.AA20553@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020617074543.4796C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu wrote:

> Not a good test, but ls .../* from my djgpp dir using an old (ancient v2.0b4)
> djgpp ls was 4 times faster than the one built with recent cvs.

("ls .../* > nul" is better, since screen I/O is not involved.)

What about "djecho .../* > nul"?

In other words, does most of the difference come from globbing (which 
would point to `glob' and `findfirst') or from `stat' (which probably 
means we are paying for the symlink support)?