Message-ID: <006d01c214fb$c2b8e840$0100a8c0@p4> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: References: Subject: DJGPP DOC zip [Was Re: binutils-2.12.1 [WAS: Re: Clio 2.04 packages]] Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 16:03:56 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com > Uploaded bnu2121b.zip, bnu2121s.zip, bnu2121a.zip (BFD) > > About documentation package: > > built (under Linux) all DOCS included in HTML, PS, DVI and PDF formats. > TeX temporary files are not included as I think they are not needed for > end user and also one needs to have source archive to rebuild docs > anyway. Sorry if I start a flame war, but I have my doubts that people use all of the different formats that are included in the doc zip files. Below is what I think, this is my thoughts, I will agree that everyone has there own opinions and ways or working, but overall we may be able to remove some of the files and therefore shrink the size of the doc packages. My thoughts:- 1) Do we need to supply all the different doc formats considering the vast majority of DJGPP users have either MS-DOS/FreeDOS or Windows? 2) I do not think we need to include PDF as PDF is only readable on Windows (not MS-DOS or FreeDOS) and I don't know any Windows user who cannot read a HTML file. 3) Now for printing PS is used to send to a PS printer (or ghostscript aka Windows). How many people have a PS printer and don't have Windows? I don't think many so therefore PS files could also be removed. 4) Does anyone use DVI? Andrew