From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200206152059.g5FKxue00121@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP and the Large File Summit (LFS)
In-Reply-To: <3D0B9A67.371F81C4@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
 Jun 15, 2002 08:49:59 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:59:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Richard Dawe:
> > Yes. So...?
> 
> A negative absolute offset into a file does not make sense.

There are no negative offsets into any file. And if you use llseek()
you won't (shouldn't) have a negative offset.




Right,

						MartinS