Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:05:28 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <8296-Sat15Jun2002210528+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <10206141524.AA16081@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: unixy sbrk and win2k
References:  <10206141524 DOT AA16081 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:24:40 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> But I wouldn't expect EMACS to be calling sbrk() when CTRL is being
> pressed?  

Why not?  Emacs is a memory-intensive program: Lisp objects are
constantly being born and once in a while deleted by the garbage
collector.  It's quite possible that CTRL is being pressed while
Emacs called sbrk, isn't it?