Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3D0797E2.BDDAD907@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:50:10 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: unixy sbrk and win2k
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020612130436 DOT 17442A-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > That's exactly the original behavior that triggered this thread and
> > > Charles' debugging of sbrk.  Are you sure you are using the patched
> > > crt0.S, not the original one which was shipped with v2.03?
> >
> > I thought this thread was triggered by Laurynas trying to use Emacs on
> > Win2k.
> 
> That's true, but you reported similar problems on NT, and I thought it
> was the same one.  Perhaps not.

I thought it was the same problem too, which is why I tried the patches. But
sadly it looks like a different problem.

(I think we may be getting our wires crossed. I think we're in agreement,
though!)

> > Now I'm confused. Which patches should I apply to crt0.S? I've tried the
> > following:
> >
> > * Laurynas's DS alias patch;
> > * Charles's cli patch.
> 
> I meant the latter.

OK. That didn't stop Emacs crashing in the way I described.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]