Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:05:46 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: unixy sbrk and win2k
In-Reply-To: <3D0709B1.ED4921D4@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020612130436.17442A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> [snip]
> > That's exactly the original behavior that triggered this thread and
> > Charles' debugging of sbrk.  Are you sure you are using the patched
> > crt0.S, not the original one which was shipped with v2.03?
> 
> I thought this thread was triggered by Laurynas trying to use Emacs on Win2k.

That's true, but you reported similar problems on NT, and I thought it 
was the same one.  Perhaps not.

> Now I'm confused. Which patches should I apply to crt0.S? I've tried the
> following:
> 
> * Laurynas's DS alias patch;
> * Charles's cli patch.

I meant the latter.