From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10206111822.AA15866@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: unixy sbrk and win2k
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:22:08 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
In-Reply-To: <3D062784.1DDFAF8D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Jun 11, 2002 05:38:28 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > > directory. I got a segfault, when temacs was trying to dump.
> > 
> > Is this with v2.03, v2.03 refresh, or CVS libraries?
> 
> It's CVS from about a month to a month and a half ago, built with gcc 3.04.

I think it's very possible this is due to a CVS issue.  Try building
with a v2.03 refresh and see if it fails.

> [snip]
> > Best thing is to understand why it's failing in the dump.
> 
> I agree, but I need the workaround ot get a decent editor under Windows NT 4.
> MS-DOS Edit doesn't quite cut it. 8)

Does the prebuilt binary not work properly?