Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:41:14 +0300 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v2.03 update 2
In-Reply-To: <3D0526FF.A5D09C38@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10206110926180.28020-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Actually, I have a question about DJGPP.ENV, after hand-patching. In the RHIDE
> section, why do we have:
> 
>     +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx m
>     +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cxx=stdcxx m
>     +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cpp=stdcxx m
>     +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS.f=g2c m
> 
> Why is there no '_DJGPP' in RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS.f? It used to be called
> RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f. Looking at a message from Andris called "[Fix for
> v2.03 refresh] Re: Undefined reference to _finite" on Thu, 30 May 2002
> 09:57:44 +0300 (WET), I see that his patch contains a
> RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f.

It's a bug. There is no need for RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f as the name
of libg2c.a does not change for DJGPP. We have to do such hack for
C++ as name of libstdc++ changes to libstdcxx for DJGPP.

As I saw current CVS version of djgpp.env is correct (RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS.f
used) and we have agreed to put it there for v2.03 update, then I'll not
fixing this bug now.

Andris