Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:56:00 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Eric Rudd <rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Subject: Re: ISO C99 double math functions
In-Reply-To: <3D04F38D.D1CC5FE9@cyberoptics.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020611085520.3231A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Eric Rudd wrote:

> My suggestion would be to put the new functions in libc in order to avoid FAQs,
> but start by simply copying the appropriate routines from libm that are not
> currently present in libc.

This might just be the best alternative.  Any objections?