From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10206110440.AA18724@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: v2.03 update 2
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:40:38 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <200206110155.g5B1tlu23523@envy.delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Jun 10, 2002 09:55:47 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I usually use something like 2002-Jun-04 when I need to be
> unambiguous.  If the day is omitted, "June 2002" sounds best to me.

No day planned - even committing to a month is a huge leap of faith :-)

Last time I used "12/2001" when I edited the file over Thanksgiving in late
November - last mods were on Dec 25 with a release in January 2002 ...