Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:55:47 -0400
Message-Id: <200206110155.g5B1tlu23523@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3D052D3E.618C99A8@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Mon, 10
	Jun 2002 18:50:38 -0400)
Subject: Re: v2.03 update 2
References: <10206101920 DOT AA21007 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3D052D3E DOT 618C99A8 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> As a matter of principle, maybe dates should be recorded in ISO
> standard format? i.e. "2002-06".

I usually use something like 2002-Jun-04 when I need to be
unambiguous.  If the day is omitted, "June 2002" sounds best to me.