Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3D0526FF.A5D09C38@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:23:59 +0100 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: v2.03 update 2 References: <10206101920 DOT AA21007 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Charles Sandmann wrote: [snip] > > * In djdev203.ver perhaps you could put 'June 2002' instead of '6/2002'. > > Could do so. I just modified what was done for refresh 1. Worth changing? Only if you have time. > > I extracted all of djdev203_u2.zip except djgpp.env over my current DJGPP > > installation and then rebuilt DJGPP CVS + gcc 3.1 patches in a work area. > > Have you hand edited your djgpp.env? Some reason not to test the new > version? Yeah, I've hand-edited it - CVSROOT and suchlike - and I was too busy (OK, lazy at that time ;) ) to merge it by hand. Every time I try to do everything on my DJGPP libc to-do list, the list just gets longer! Actually, I have a question about DJGPP.ENV, after hand-patching. In the RHIDE section, why do we have: +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cc=stdcxx m +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cxx=stdcxx m +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.cpp=stdcxx m +RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS.f=g2c m Why is there no '_DJGPP' in RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS.f? It used to be called RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f. Looking at a message from Andris called "[Fix for v2.03 refresh] Re: Undefined reference to _finite" on Thu, 30 May 2002 09:57:44 +0300 (WET), I see that his patch contains a RHIDE_TYPED_LIBS_DJGPP.f. > > I also built and ran some tests in tests/libc/ansi/stdio. FWIW that all > > worked fine. > > Thanks. This is mostly documentation and a few lines of fixes, I didn't > expect much bad to happen. Did the DSM look OK? The DSM looked fine. I downloaded the full refresh a minute ago. I've just upgraded to it using zippo. I've just rebuilt DJGPP CVS + some patches with gcc 3.1 - this is the test I did before. So the full refresh ZIP looks fine too. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]