Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:20:06 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patches for build with gcc 3.1 - FSEXT chunk
In-Reply-To: <3D049881.9ED69040@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020610161914.26206A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Richard Dawe wrote:

> > The rest of the changes seem okay by inspection, but please make sure
> > that whatever changes you make in FSEXT-related parts don't break
> > existing uses of FSEXT, like dbgcom.c, GNU `ls', Ispell, etc.
> 
> I tested the patch with the following:
> 
> * ls from Fileutils 4.1, run as 'ls --color=tty';
> 
> * the demo httpgetn.c from libsocket, modified to use read() and write()
> instead of recv() and send() respectively;
> 
> * the test program for /dev/zero and /dev/full support -
> tests/libc/fsext/tzero.c;
> 
> * gdb 5.1.1 built with a dbgcom.c that was compiled with DEBUG_DBGCOM_FILES
> defined, running tests/libc/posix/unistd/append.c.

Thanks, I think this testing is good enough.  Please commit the changes.