Message-ID: <002801c2106a$8e816e20$0102a8c0@acceleron>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
References: <10206100051 DOT AA20249 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3D046B76 DOT BDAE8C20 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: Re: v2.03 update 2
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:35:05 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > I don't have time to do a GCC 3.1 install to test it, sorry.
>
> I extracted all of djdev203_u2.zip except djgpp.env over my current DJGPP
> installation and then rebuilt DJGPP CVS + gcc 3.1 patches in a work area.
I
> also built and ran some tests in tests/libc/ansi/stdio. FWIW that all
worked
> fine.

Another simple test to see if the patches worked is to build make and see if
it can then be used to re-build it'self. This is not fool proof, but so far
with the CVS LIBC should be a good test.

Andrew